UPDATE! UPDATE! UPDATE!

I've been a bit busy but here's a little update on what's going on.  First, please understand that this site is here to document not just what is going on within the "full preterist" movement but everything surrounding it, especially the fraudulent "anti-prets" who are actually causing more shame on Christ and the Church than any "full preterist" could.

Sam Frost just registered on CARM Christian Forums, so if you and others want a place to engage him publicly.  Also, he is there telling people he is personally "working on" making a more consistent preterism.

QUOTE: "Can there be a more consistent Preterism? Certainly. I am working on it!" -- Frost; http://forums.carm.org/vbb/showthread.php?113516-Why-the-anti-pret-battle-is-lost&p=3448917&viewfull=1#post3448917

See, as I've been saying, Sam hasn't left FPism, he is just looking for a way to control it, even if it means throwing the rest of you under the bus as the real "hyper prets".  Sam has done this all along; first with his effort to be the guy to "systematize" FPism and then with his effort to create a thing he called "fuller full preterism", and then with joining with Talbot's "Realized Preterism".  He just wants to be the guy in charge.  He wants his damned statue! (Sam has several time opined, in all seriousness how future generations might build a statue in his honor -- he wasn't joking)

Next, Talbotite Sharon Nichols is on FB telling people that Talbot told her that David Chilton repented of FPism on his death bed.  Of course there is no public evidence of this but only Talbot's personal word on it.  The PUBLIC EVIDENCE is that though Chilton died March 7, 1997; there is documented email exchanges between Chilton, Ed Stevens and Don Preston all the way to at least March 4th showing Chilton was CLEARLY still holding to FPism.  See here: http://www.preteristarchive.com/Hyper/1996_stevens-chilton.html
It is astounding how unfailing these Talbotite followers are in their devotion to their cult leaders.

The 'Roderick Edwards Argument' Takes Down Hyperpreterists?

Whenever someone leaves the hyperpreterist movement, one of the first things that happens is hyperpreterists come out of the woodwork DEMANDING that the former-hyperpreterist give their "new view" on eschatology.  First of all, the whole thought process exposes what is wrong with hyperpreterism in the first place; it is a radical individualistic interpretation of the Bible.  Hyperpreterism, much like liberal politics thinks that the things they do, others do or should do also.  In this case, since hyperpreterists are prone to putting forth "their view", their personal view on eschatology they also want to hear "your view".

See, it becomes a matter of chest-thumping one-upmanship with hyperpreterists.  They claim they are more "consistent" or more "logical", or more "exegetical" -- no matter what "view" anyone puts forth.  We have seen this with hyperpreterists like Mike Sullivan.  It is pointless to engage them since they promise to ignore what you are saying before you even start.

It is not about presenting a personal "view" -- rather let us be about determining the Christian view on any topic instead of being so eager to put forth our own personal "view".  After all, we DO believe there is a UNITED Christian view on any given topic don't we???  Or are we going to give the hyperpreterists their way in the doors of our hearts and minds by wrongly agreeing with them that Christianity has been in doctrinal chaos for the last 2000 years???

This brings us to the title of this article.  In a discussion with hyperpreterist leader Sam Frost, excoriating Frost for trying to re-image if not leave the hyperpreterist movement altogether; Frost's fellow hyperpreterist Jordan Grant had this to say:

"It's so crushing to see the Rod Edwards argumentation being used. I mean, I saw it with Sharon...and Vince...now Jason, and I sure hope Sam doesn't follow suit." -- source