Preterist vs Futurist vs Christian

The main premise of Preterism, not just Full or Hyper-preterism but all types of preterism is that something went terribly wrong; somehow God's eschatological plan was either grossly misunderstood or covered up until almost 2000 years later when the Preterists came to fore.  They explain that what mostly likely happened, since the bulk of historical Christianity has not believed the Preterist interpretation is that fallible men messed up.  And what Christian wouldn't agree that men fallible and prone to fail to understand?  Thus opens the door for the Preterist to walk in and relabel historical Christianity as merely "Futurism".  Thus begins the dichotomy of the supposed "Bible-alone" Preterists against the supposed "Bible and Creeds" Futurists. And oddly, many Christians will lay down and accept being labeled as "Futurist" and will call themselves by this term.

While I clearly understand the need for more detailed descriptors, false or inaccurate descriptors should be rejected.  For example, it would be wrong to call one person a Pro-Choice advocate and the other an Anti-Choice advocate.  In the same way, Hyper-preterists are fond of claiming they are "Full Preterists" while others are "Partial-Preterists".  This is a false descriptor since it implies that one person takes things fully while the other only partially.  Of course, no one committed to something wants to be considered to be "partially" committed to it, thus already prejudicing judgment against the so-called "Partial-Preterist" position.

Challenge to Sam Frost

Okay enough is enough Sam Frost. I CHALLENGE you to do a podcast with me where we can discuss all these points directly. Just you and I; no little snickering Jason in the background. None of your little sycophant cheerleaders. No elitist Mullah with his own denomination hypocritically making 9 part-series on the 9th commandment as he breaks it with wontoness. No mouthy pseudo-named pill-popping woman. No "pay-per-view". No book deals or disk sales. Just you and me man to man. I will document all of the lies and contradictions and falsehoods and I want EVERYONE to hear how Sam Frost responds. Will it be cool and calm or the frantic. manic Sam I am accustomed to speaking with whenever I have spoken with you on the phone.


You can't do it. This is the reason you run back to your own website and spout off junk where your P.R. man Jason can protect you. I will and do post on any forum that is open to me. I'm not a lying coward like you Sam. Let's go!

Kenneth Talbot Defines Himself

Well, if you can stomach the stuck-up windbag tone and the blatant hypocrisy of Talbot; he has done 3 podcasts on of all things; the 9th Commandment.  This is like calling Sam Frost an "expert" on eschatology as Talbot has done.  Anyhow, on the 3rd podcast Talbot in a round about way calls out hyperpreterist Dave Green.  As you know, Dave claims that Talbot writes or edits material for his groupies -- which has been true in the past -- since he first-handed asked to edit some of my own material and has indeed written at least one anonymous article for Pretblog that I directly know of.  Yes, that corruption was going on as I was departing from that site.  Further, Talbot used an anonymous name ("Superpreterist") when Sharon Nichols used to run her hyperpret site.  Anyhow; in the podcast Talbot says: