Helping Dee Dee Warren

Maybe Dee Dee Warren can see herself in this dramatization.  Maybe she can figure it out.

This video symbolically represents most of the content of PreteristBlog.com

Women in Theological Battle

1 Peter 3:7 reads, "Husbands, in the same way be considerate as you live with your wives, and treat them with respect as the weaker partner and as heirs with you of the gracious gift of life, so that nothing will hinder your prayers."

What does God mean by calling the wife "weaker"?  In what way? Physically?  See Strong's #G772 ἀσθενής and you can see the word has been used to indicate weak and sick among other less common uses.  Obviously, we don't see women as "sick".  In fact, in no way does it indicate women are inferior to men.  However, there is need to generally protect them.  Even in the United States, quickly becoming one of the most liberal nations on earth, we protect our women in not letting them on the front lines of a battlefield.  Battle does something to a person.  It hardens them.  Makes them more cynical perhaps.  It doesn't necessarily turn them into a bad person but because they need a strong resolve, they are less likely to engage in petty talk or activities.

Former WTS Student Advises Against It.

Dee Dee Warren, the self-styled champion against hyperpreterism has some wise advice for anyone who is thinking about attending Whitefield Theological Seminary (WTS).  Back in December 2008 before she was silenced with a free tuition from WTS, Warren had this to say about WTS:

"If I were taking courses through Whitfield, I would be very upset if I found out that I was under the teaching of a hyperpreterist." -- http://www.preteristblog.com/?p=1163#comment-2760

Well, even though WTS WAS clearly allowing known hyperpreterist, Sam Frost develop student materials for the seminary, without full disclosure to the students; after WTS' president, Kenneth Talbot approached Warren with flattery and a free tuition to WTS, she suddenly was no longer "upset".  Granted, after I approached WTS as to why they were allowing a known hyperpreterist develop material for the seminary, Frost supposedly ended the relationship.  But the FACT that WTS had been allowing a known hyperpreterist didn't seem to phase Warren.

FULL PRETERISTS HAVE BEEN ABUSED?

Set aside for a moment the entire debate as to whether or not Full Preterism is true or not. How did many people become FPists? Often through the interpretative works of men such as Gary DeMar and Kenneth Gentry. These men have written books that take a person right to the edge of FPism and then drop them off. Further, the works by these men (especially DeMar) don't usually make a clear distinction between the differences of so-called "Partial-Preterism" and FPism. As a matter of fact, most of the reasoning from the pens of these men; if held consistently, SHOULD lead a person to conclude FPism.

PreteristBlog.Com and Dee Dee Warren -- It WAS "Personal"

Dee Dee Warren recently said:

"Yes, I have published works against Sam, MikeB, and Jason for wrongs against me. Guess what? All but MikeB apologized, and I… (big shocker coming)…. I forgave them! Being positive that I am hardly perfect myself, I asked their forgiveness, and…. (big shocker coming)…. they forgave me!" -- http://www.preteristblog.com/?p=5729#comment-17481

Ah...so it WAS "personal" after all. I mean, what Dee Dee Warren is saying here is that all her work amounts to "wrongs" against these people eh? And all their work as FPists also amount to "wrongs" against her. It was simply a pee-pee match that has come to a conclusion right? I mean, there is no need to seek "forgiveness" if all Dee Dee Warren was pointing out the errors of these people -- they remain a FACT no matter what changes they made.


This is sort of like when the liberals were wringing their hands, trying to figure out what we did to "cause" the terrorists to attack us. This is sort of like Obama jetsetting all over the world to "apologize" for America..well... being America.

Well you know what, Dave and most FPists need never apologize to me nor I them; no matter if either of us change positions. You know why??? Because it wasn't personal. You don't see us speculating about another person's mental health -- especially when all the FACTS say that person is a stable individual. Can we talk about a person's demonstrated behavior/approach? Indeed, especially if it is relevant to what they are saying. But you see Dee Dee Warren has ALWAYS operated on a "personal" level. This is the reason she likes to post anonymous emails (which could be bogus for all we know), that tell her how great and humble a person she is while her critics are big meanies. Talbotites NEED validation. They NEED to create their own denominations, churches, seminaries. They NEED to tell people how smart they think they are; how big their library is, how "scholarly" and therefore expectant of payment for their 5 page articles they are. They NEED cheerleaders.

So, now we know that all the work on PreteristBlog should just be flushed down the toilet since it was all merely based on "personal" issues. Now that Sam and company claim to be "orthodox", it is time for PaulT to "apologize" to Sam -- since now in retrospect, PaulT was just being "personally" mean to Sam . Never mind the FACTS. Get to it PaulT.

Um-yeah. Again, I publicly ask that ALL my articles be removed from PreteristBlog since it is now confirmed as merely a site full of Dee Dee Warren's "personal" issues with folks. I don't want my work to get confused with Dee Dee Warren's misdirected work that she may need to later apologize for; since I have nothing to apologize for when it comes to the things I've written. My writings are FACT based, not "emotionalism" or some sort of argumentum ad misericordiam. My work had nothing to do with "wrongs against me" -- that is the mentality of a self-absorbed person who needs attention. My work is based on the ACTUAL things these folks said, wrote, and did...not to me, but in general and specifically theologically. So, now we see it was all just "personal" with these folks.

Dee Dee Warren's Fantasy World

BEFORE she sold out to the compromiser; Kenneth Talbot, Dee Dee Warren maintained the stalwart site against hyperpreterism.  People may have thought of her as "rude" or "mean" or even..."crass" in her approach, but her integrity was never in question at that time.  But ever since she sold out to the CULT LEADER Talbot, she has lost her integrity.
Here is an example.  Dee Dee recently said:

"[Roderick] also claims that his issues with me and this site started because he kept asking Dr. Talbot certain questions. That is false. That is a cover story he created after the fact, and anyone can go back through the posts here and see that." -- http://www.preteristblog.com/?p=5691#comment-17316 

Okay, let's actually look at the posts from those days.  First article comment by Dee Dee about the issue BEFORE she sold out to Talbot for a free tuition:

"Hey Roderick, You Who Shall Not Be Named, I think you are once again being gossiped about back at Sammy’s kennel of trained hound-dogs. He is whining about some letter to Whitefield Theological Seminary. His readers are left guessing as to who wrote it, and since it is only you and I are who are not allowed to be named, yet still seem to be two of the primary subject matters over there, and I didn’t write it, I guess you did. Good for you. I sure hope you plan on dismantling it. If not, I will. I may write to Whitefield myself." -- Oct 16, 2008 -- http://www.preteristblog.com/?p=887 

Hmmm, at that time Dee Dee thought it was "good" that I wrote to Talbot's self-made seminary and she considered writing to WTS herself.  Further, in my comments on the thread, upon Talbot releasing my email to Sam Frost I said:

Sam Frost Admits He "has not left" Hyperpreterism

Sam Frost finally admits his eschatology is STILL being affected by his hyperpreterism AND that there are "some good insights" within hyperpreterism that he has "not left".   And consider that Frost mentor, Ken Talbot has said his eschatology is "akin to Chilton's eschatology".  Chilton who was an open "full preterist".

In an email to his former friend, Mike Bennett Frost said:

> Sam Frost to me in email 4/11/12:

> "My eschatology has been modified by my study in FP, to be sure. There are some good insights here and there that I have not left (like my millennial position)"

Unfortunately, Frost's little supporters will do nothing but ignore or cover up this statement by Frost.

Sam Frost the "Ordained" Sorcerer?

Jason "book-burner" Bradfield is getting "way cool" high-fives from Frostian sycophants for burning several FPists books (see video: http://youtu.be/vQRswlaAFuI ). Jason uses Acts 19:19-20 to justify the burning. The verses read:

"Many of them also which used curious arts brought their books together and burned them before all men and they counted the price of them and found it fifty thousand pieces of silver. So mightily grew the word of God and prevailed." Acts 19:19-20

Now, if FPism books are to be compared to "magic arts" then can we compare the people who teach/taught FPism to sorcerers? Especially those who claimed to be FPist "pastors"? Here comes the hypocrisy -- Sam Frost, STILL claims the title of "pastor" even though the only type of "pastor" he was, was over a FPist congregation. Why doesn't Frost disavow his time as a "sorcerer"??? Because he is a flat out hypocrite and while he bad-mouths FPists, he still wants to beef up his profile -- so he LIES to the unsuspecting Christian who may think Sam was a REAL pastor. He never was. Frost's own mentor/daddy said: